free invisible hit counter

Spotify Explain: Why we cut the Free Service..

Comments (5)

35spotifythumb.jpgAt the beginning of May, Spotify changed the terms of their Free account and made a lot of people upset. We got a bunch of comments on our articles about the changes so we decided to interview Spotify about why they'd done it, and whether they still believed in their Free service.

It was the power users of their Free service that took the hit when their listening time was halved to 10 hours a month and a 5 play-only limit was imposed on all songs.

We questioned Spotify closely about why they'd done it, and whether they were giving up on the freemium model. UK PR Manager Sally Whately replied to us.

Two points stick out:
- Apparently only 3/10 Spotify Free users reached the 20 hour limit on the previous
- Spotify are still committed to having Free users: but they see it as a music player (import your MP3s from your computer) and a "discovery" service, rather than the previous listen to free music set-up that we knew and loved.

Still - is it wise to hit your most dedicated users like that? Was the old Spotify too good to last? What do you think? Tell us in the comments.


1) A lot of people were very upset about your changes to Spotify Free. Why did you decide that the previous 20hr, ad-supported model Spotify Free level wasn't sustainable?

Spotify: We've shown that the model is doing extremely well, but as things stand we need to tweak the service to ensure everyone continues to have access to legal music.

We have been required to put these changes in place to ensure we are able to continue to offer the Spotify service to as many people as possible and we are confident only the small percentage of heavier users of free will be affected.

2) Was it because you're thinking about moving into the US and that American record labels drove a very hard deal on free listening?

Spotify:No, this decision has nothing to do with our plans to move into the US. In terms of this, nothing is set yet but we will have both free and paid options when we launch in the US.

3) Are you trying to make the majority of your users payers rather than ad-supported listeners?

Spotify:Absolutely not. We are committed to delivering the best possible service that everyone can enjoy. We have worked very hard to ensure that everyone has the ability to listen to, discover, share and manage their music legally and that has required us to put some limits in place.

4) What do you say to people who say that the new Spotify Free is untenable to use as a regular music service? (-ie it's not just a reduction, but a complete change in how people can use it - for example people are only able to listen to playlists they've made 5 times)

Spotify:Spotify Free is still a fantastic service. Our free users have access to a catalogue of over 13 million tracks, with 10,000 additional tracks added every single day. That's still an amazing offer and all for free.

The changes we have made primarily affect heavier Spotify Free/Open users as most free users mainly use Spotify to discover new music, so not only do our free users still have a massive catalogue to choose from but Spotify remains a great way to discover new music as well sharing and managing music.

The average user won't reach the limit on plays for the vast majority of tracks (7 out of 10) and we'll continue to bring users the biggest and most diverse music catalogue available. And the majority of users of the free service discover around 50 new tracks per month. Our users are using Spotify to find new tracks to enjoy and share with friends and the changes to the service won't get in their way of doing that.

In addition, with the latest upgrade to the service (http://www.spotify.com/uk/blog/archives/2011/05/04/spotify-says-hello-to-the-ipod), we announced new features, which are available to all free users and include:
· The ability for users to manage their iPod in Spotify

· The all new Spotify download service, offering some of the most competitive MP3 prices available

· The Spotify Mobile app now available to all to sync MP3 playlists

These new features mean that Spotify is the only music player our users need to manage all of their music.

36-spotify.png

5) Do you have any plans to change the 5 listens to one song ever rule? That has been flagged up as the harshest thing about the changes.

Spotify:We're always looking at our service to make sure it is the best we can offer for everyone.

6) Has Spotify given up on the Freemium model? Do you think an ad-supported music player can ever work?

Spotify:Absolutely not - we have not given up on the Freemium model. It's crucial that we continue to offer our users a free service that gives them access to all the world's music with thousands of tracks added daily.

We want to have a model that can work for everyone and not just a one size fits all. Having both a free and paid service that ensures that everyone has the ability to listen to, discover, share and manage their music legally. The Freemium model is crucial to Spotify's continued growth and success.

7) Would you do any more flexible pricing options? I know you do a £5 a month deal but I actually got a message from a student asking if you could do a £3/£2 one for more limited amounts of music? it does sound a bit ridiculous to me - but someone did ask..

Spotify: We want to offer the widest possible choice of options for all our users and we recently announced an upgrade to our service, which includes a download service. This new MP3 download service makes it possible for our users to own their playlists - all in one easy step. By introducing a range of MP3 bundles, we've been able to offer some of the most competitive prices available - from as little as 50p per song. Our service is geared towards playlist building and buying - however it is still possible to buy a la carte on Spotify.

Many of our users don't have smartphones, or they don't want the monthly expense of a subscription. What most do have is a device to play their music on the go, so offering downloads is a natural progression for us in order to ensure that everyone can access their favourite music whenever and wherever they are.

8) What do you say to the idea that cutting the number of Free users affects the service that paying subscribers get? For example reducing the number of playlists available (from friends, music blogs) and the amount of social interaction on the service.

Spotify:It's important to remember that the average user won't reach the limit on plays for the vast majority of tracks and our free users discover around 50 new tracks per month, even after using Spotify for a year. The changes won't get in the way of our users finding new tracks to enjoy and share with friends.

9) Do you know when Spotify is moving to the US?

Spotify:We're working hard to get the service to the US as soon as possible. All we can say right now is watch this space.

Related: The cut to Spotify Free makes the service worse for paying users too

Think you know Assassin's Creed ? Prove it! Take our Assassin's Creed travel quiz

Check out the best iPhone 4 accessories here

  • Howard W Fisher

    Classic bait and switch. I'm going back to free Pandora. Spotify was wonderful while it lasted but not willing to pay a monthly fee for a mobile app.

  • Claire

    Recently went past the 10 hour limit... not impressed, i didnt even no spotify does this. not worth it anymore. so going to uninstall! for someone who cant afford to keep buying music, it was very handy. Just a shame they had to have such limits!

  • social aspect and music discovery and scrobbling i dotn think i would ever go back to spotify, even if they sent me a personal invitiation.

  • I might try an account to see if this is any good.. Is there any reviews on the product?

  • I love how people who prefer to let other people

    lead rather than lift a finger themselves constantly have

    something negative to say.

blog comments powered by Disqus
©2014 Shiny Digital Privacy Policy